2014 Annual Science Report

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reporting  |  SEP 2013 – DEC 2014

Early Animals: Modeling the Biotic-Abiotic Interface in the Early Evolution of Multicellular Form

Project Summary

The size of early multicellular organisms was sufficint to modify their local environment. Our initial work modeling of Neoproterozoic frond-like forms in the earliest-known communities of multicellular organisms demonstrates they were of sufficient scale and density to generate a distinctive canopy flow-regime. This modified environment yielded a selective advantage towards large eukaryotic forms that evolved at this time. This result is a function of limits imposed by diffusion at the surface of organisms, and how height and attendant velocity exposure escape these limits. Building on these results, we are now developing additional models of abiotic/biotic interactions at organismal surfaces, which are implicit in the morphology, development and orientation of other Neoproterozoic fossils. Ultimately, this work will help illuminate how forms initialy dependent on passive diffusion became more trophically complex, yielding a transition to the animal radiation.

4 Institutions
3 Teams
1 Publication
1 Field Site
Field Sites

Project Progress

Our initial work effectively addressed the advantage of size in the earliest know communities of large multicellular organisms, found at Mistaken point in Newfoundland. We found that nutrient uptake rates are strongly controlled by fluid velocity in the low-velocity regimes characteristic of these deep-water environments, and that canopy flow models generated a velocity gradient that extended far above the bottom. Consequently, there was a strong advantage to increase exposure to flow through growth higher height above the sea floor. These heights could only be achieved by multicellular eukaryotic architecture—explaining the advantage of eukaryotic size in the late Precambrian at the dawn of animal life.

Our initial work on this (Ghisalberti et al. 2014) was published in Current Biology along with a companion piece (Xiao 2014) and video abstract. This publication has been widely cited in the popular and scientific press (see links below).

We are now extending this research through additional modeling of surface biotic/abiotic processes relevant to the early evolution of complex life. In particular Jacobs, with Ghisalberti and Treude, are developing new models for processes occurring across epithelia placed at the sediment-water interface. These models are initially intended to speak to the processes going on in flatlying ediacaran forms such as Dickinsonia. As part of this project, we have developed an ancestral state reconstruction model linking the development process observed in Dickinsonia with the terminal addition process thought to be ancestral in Bilateria; this work has been presented at an international meeting and is in review (see Fig. 1). We anticipate that biotic epithelial, when placed in contact with the sediment surface, will modify redox gradients due to differences in permeability, and transport properties of biotic surface relative to the underlying sediment. This may lead to a more general epithelium uptake-based model for the evolution of early multicellular form, where epethilia provide partitions critical to modifying the environment to augment processes at the bioticabiotic interface to the nutritional benefit of the organism. We anticipate that this combined approach—where environment and epithelia are modeled in concert—will illuminate aspects of the early evolution of multicellular form.

Links to coverage in the popular press:
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/scientists-reveal-why-life-got-249899 http://marinesciencetoday.com/2014/01/28/why-did-life-in-the-oceans-get-so-big/

http://www.scoop.it/t/fundoshi-topics/p/4015503878/2014/02/07/current-biology-canopy-flow-analysis-reveals-the-advantage-of-size-in-the-oldest-communities-of-multicellular-eukaryotes

Canopy Flow Analysis Reveals http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140123125536.htm

http://article.wn.com/view/2014/01/24/Scientists_reveal_why_life_got_big_in_the_Earths_early_ocean/

http://www.ineffableisland.com/2014/01/why-life-got-big-in-earths-early-oceans.html

http://scitechdaily.com/study-reveals-life-earths-early-oceans-increased-size/

http://www.yourepeat.com/watch/?v=MwM1bMmPn7g

http://www.thodan.net/watch/MwM1bMmPn7g.html

http://player.mashpedia.com/player.php?q=MwM1bMmPn7g

http://paleonews.ru/index.php/new/288-ediacarian

http://360available.blogspot.com/2014_02_01_archive.html

http://www.mydailynewswatchng.com/life-early-oceans-increased-size/?wpmp_switcher=mobile&wpmp_tp=0

http://www.rdmag.com/news/2014/01/scientists-reveal-why-life-got-big-earth%E2%80%99s-early-oceans

http://sciworthy.com/science-news/research-communications/evolution-in-body-size-and-form-of-600-million-year-old-deep-sea-fossil-communities/

http://techlately.com/study-reveals-why-life-in-earths-early-oceans-increased-in-size/

https://phenomenalistempiricism.wordpress.com/2014/02/page/3/ voxhumana-english.com/Newest%20Science%20News%20Blog%20201
voxhumana-english.com/Newest%20Science%20News%20Blog%20201

A time-calibrated molecular phylogeny of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, and their close relatives). Maximum likelihood-based ancestral states reconstruction is visualized using pie charts at the major nodes. The purpose of this project is to characterize the probability of “terminal addition” style development in the opisthokonts, a mode of growth that can also be found in late Proterozoic forms such as Dickinsonia (after Gold et al., in review).

  • PROJECT INVESTIGATORS:
  • PROJECT MEMBERS:
    David Jacobs
    Project Investigator

    Marco Ghisalberti
    Co-Investigator

    David Gold
    Co-Investigator

    David Johnston
    Co-Investigator

    Marc LaFlamme
    Co-Investigator

    Roger Summons
    Co-Investigator

    Tina Treude
    Collaborator

  • RELATED OBJECTIVES:
    Objective 4.1
    Earth's early biosphere.

    Objective 4.2
    Production of complex life.

    Objective 5.2
    Co-evolution of microbial communities

    Objective 6.1
    Effects of environmental changes on microbial ecosystems